according to comments on youtube, this is several years old, so it's not a conscious emmulation of the khazakhstani journalist.
notice the solo around 3:10 and the proto-reggaeton beat
on that note, here's an image: the world as a sound synthesizer perpetually producing and reproducing "music" which is recorded on several billion tracks (the currently living breathing synaptic memory banks that are not unlike editable tracks). circulation of information (signal) creates glitches (noise) and in the process emerges something aesthetically valuable (life as the soundtrack to our existence).
The Guardian is tracing the recent clash of egos on the trans-Atlantic "Gypsy/Balkan music scene". As it turns out, neither is it a scene ("most of these musicians have never met" if we're to believe the author), nor is there Gypsy or even Balkan music (according to Shantel). Still in this definitional vacuum there's an (un-)surprising amount of finger pointing and name calling.
I don't find authenticity particularly interesting these days (any Roma musician in Bulgaria claims to be more "authentic" than the next, just like in any other music scene, existing or not); even less interesting are rigorous definitions of the genre - leave it to the gurus in the World Music section of Virgin to come up with the most marketable category. What is fascinating to me is Zach's pseudo-naive question "Isn't a melody enough?"
A DJ would never (I hope) permit herself such innocence in using/appropriating a style of music. When I spin an Arabic track form
Through DJ /rupture's blog, I ran across Orlando Patterson's piece on the dialectic between Western/American culture and
So, when all is said and played, "isn't a melody enough"?